Many women have pushed the narrative that if a man splits bills with a woman, then he is not fit to be the leader (head) of the family. They said that if he is broke, he does not deserve a woman. They say, and even support it with their Bible, that if he cannot provide for his family, he is worse than an infidel.
These spoiled kids (women) are just trying to maintain their dominance over men without appearing to do so, and I do not blame them. Everyone needs a fool. I wonder who told them that leadership is about provision. Many of them know, but they do not care as long as men refuse to use their brains.
Provision may complement leadership; it is not a basic quality of a leader. A person who manages resources properly is more of a leader than a person who provides the resources. Leadership is about management! However, these poverty-stricken, manipulative women have a different idea.
A man, being the leader of the family, has little or nothing to do with providing for the family. Lack of provision does not and should not diminish a man's ability to be the leader of the family. A man’s job as the leader of his family is to manage the provisions and affairs of the family appropriately, whether or not he is the provider.
Jesus fed 5000 people without having provided any food for them; he only increased what was provided. Can we now say that the lad who provided the few fish and bread was the leader because he provided?
Can we say that Jesus Christ was unfit to be the leader because he could not provide them with food?
Jesus Christ, being the leader of the group, told his disciples to look for food for the crowd to eat. He did not have to work and bring the food. Does it make him less of a leader? Whatever you think of him, think of a man, as the head of the family.
Get it right before it goes wrong any further; a man who pays your bills, unless he forbids you from working to earn money, is much more than a god to you. He is, by providing for you, already doing for you what God is not doing for you.
If you respect God and pray to him, then respect him too by giving him 100% loyalty and obedience, whether they are convenient for you or not. A man who is doing for you what your God will not do, even though he can, deserves more than that.
If God provides for you, then why do you have to work to earn money instead of praying to him to supply your needs?
If God pays your bills, why do you have to depend on a man to foot your bills?
As the leader of Nigeria, how much money does Tinubu provide for Nigeria?
Does Nigeria depend on his money to run the country?
Will his money be enough to run Nigeria?
If leadership is about having enough to provide, then Dangote, the richest man in Nigeria, should be our president. He has enough money to pay everyone’s bills. Why is he not the president?
This should show you that leadership, whether in the family or otherwise, is about the proper management of the resources available, regardless of who provided them, and not about providing the resources.
CEOs of companies are not chosen based on how much money they have, but based on their ability to manage the affairs and resources of the company appropriately.
The CEO's ability to manage the company's resources and affairs appropriately helps the company make more money, but he does not need to have the money before he can lead the company. It should be the same with a man as the head of the family.
If you are a marriage-hopeful woman who always judges a potential husband by the size of his wallet instead of the quality of his character, then you do not need a husband; you need a slave to work for your family.
Click on the link below to follow me on Facebook
0 comments