Ballot Box Attack, One Year Later - Support Charter Review That Makes Sense
Oct 29, 2025 1:41 am
🚨SUPPORT CHARTER REVIEW THAT MAKES SENSE!🚨 
CLICK HERE TO READ THE LETTER TO THE EDITOR IN CLARKCOUNTYTODAY.COM
WATCH NEW 60s VIDEO ABOUT PROPERTY TAX INCREASES
ONE YEAR AGO... BALLOT BOX ATTACK 
October 28th marks the one-year anniversary of the worst attacks on Clark County's election system, outside of mail-in ballots, of course.
Many people may not be aware that while Auditor Kimsey initially resisted installing ballot box cameras earlier that year, citing the cost and lack of merit, he has since reversed his stance. Cameras began to be installed a few months ago at a cost of approximately $400,000. This is considerably less than the $900,000 to $1 million figure he mentioned during an interview with Lars Larson, which served as a significant talking point for him at the time.
Additionally, the fire extinguisher systems have been replaced with ones specifically designed or tested for ballot boxes. Yes, he deployed systems not designed for the ballot boxes.
It's also important to remember that Kimsey had not provided procedures for handling a fire, which resulted in ballots burning for almost THREE hours before an attempt was made to extinguish the flames, leading to the destruction of hundreds of ballots.
Despite his lack of action exacerbating the outcome, State bureaucrats awarded Kimsey for his response to these attacks and the person(s) responsible are still at large.
The person(s) are still at large, and the attacks seem to slip away into the memory hole. It's hard to believe that the government can round up hundreds of people near or in the Capitol on January 6 but seem to can't find anybody responsible for the worst attacks on our voting system. Seems odd, doesn't it?
ICYMI: FIVE Democrat Charter Candidates Violated PDC State law & Sixth Still Under Investigation 
Over a week ago, I filed PDC complaints against SIX Democrat Charter Review candidates (all of them recommended by the Clark County Democrat Party) who failed to follow PDC laws requiring complete "paid for" statements on all their campaign signs. Five of the candidates had incomplete "paid for" statements and one of them failed to have any "paid for" statement (Janet Landesberg, who also happens to be a lawyer).
If they can't follow simple laws for their campaign, can they be trusted to perform the duties of Charter Review?
This week, PDC posted that after reviewing the complaint and the supporting evidence, the PDC staff determined that the following appeared to have violated RCW 42.17A (campaign signs missing complete “paid for” statements):
- Randi Knott (District 5, Position 3)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180403
- John Bower (District 2, Position 1)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180411
- Ben Christly (District 3, Position 1)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180412
- Henry Marion (District 3, Position 3)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180413
- Amber Kent (District 4, Position 1)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180414
PENDING further investigation (more significant allegation):
- Janet Landesberg (District 3, Position 2)
https://www.pdc.wa.gov/rules-enforcement/enforcement/enforcement-cases/180267
The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) has received a complaint against Janet Landesberg (the "Respondent") and are investigating the allegation(s) under PDC Case 180267 for failure to include required “paid for” statements on all campaign signs.
SUPPORT CHARTER REVIEW THAT MAKES SENSE
CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
Clark County Republican Party Endorsements For Nov 4 Elections!
Clark County Republican Women Recommendations! 
Click HERE To Register
Trust in the Lord with all your heart
and lean not on your own understanding;
in all your ways submit to him,
and he will make your paths straight.
Proverbs 3:5-6
SUPPORT MICHELLE BELKOT LEGAL FUND HERE
Councilor Belkot has pursued legal counsel and has been advised her case has strong merit and will likely set precedent when fully adjudicated. This will be a long, and expensive litigation. Please consider supporting this action.
The voters of Clark County have voted to reject light rail in Clark County on three separate occasions. At the March 18, 2025 Clark County Council meeting approximately 150 citizens were in attendance with several dozen offering public testimony. Easily 80% of those who spoke during the 2-1/2 hours of comment were there to support Michelle and oppose the actions of the other council members.
Evidence will prove this was an orchestrated hit job on Councilor Belkot. Please support our only County Councilor who is standing for her constituents, and please pray for her as this understandably has taken a toll.
NO $2 BILLION LIGHT RAIL / NO TOLLS
ALL FUNDS RAISED ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR LEGAL COSTS AND WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY POLITICAL ACTIVITY.
Click HERE To Follow On X (Twitter) 
Click HERE To Follow On Facebook
Or HERE To Follow On Instagram
Reform Clark County only encourages lawful and respectful action that leads to meaningful constitutional reforms in Clark County