Google Reads Your Schema One Way. AI Reads It Another

Dec 03, 2025 12:58 pm

Here’s a truth most SEOs still haven’t caught up to: Google and AI models do not use schema in the same way.


And the gap between them is widening fast.


If you’re only optimizing structured data for Google…


Then you’re missing out on the biggest opportunity in search since featured snippets.


Let’s break down what matters — in plain English.


🔥 Google SEO: Strict, Limited, and Rule-Based

Google uses schema for one main purpose:


👉 Rich results.


That means:

  • Reviews
  • Stars
  • Local business details
  • FAQ/HowTo
  • Articles
  • Products
  • Events
  • Breadcrumbs

…and that’s pretty much it.


If Google doesn’t have a rich result for your schema type, it mostly ignores the rest.


And it’s strict. Google requires:

  • Perfect content parity (schema must match visible page content)
  • Supported types only
  • No creative “extra” fields
  • No enhanced summaries or metadata


Google schema is narrow.


It’s functional.

It’s compliance-based.


📌 What Google Officially Says About Schema

1. “Structured data is not used for ranking.”

— Google Search Central

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/intro-structured-data


2. “Structured data does not give you a ranking boost.”

— John Mueller (Google Search Advocate)

Search Central Office Hours


3. “Structured data isn’t a ranking factor.”

— Danny Sullivan (Google Search Liaison)


4. Google only uses a limited list of schema types (rich results)

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/search-gallery


5. Unsupported schema is simply ignored, not used for ranking.

— Google Search Central documentation


🔍 So why do some SEOs claim Schema helps rankings?

Because when a page earns a rich result:

  • It becomes more prominent
  • CTR improves
  • User engagement often improves
  • That indirectly influences ranking
  • But the structured data itself didn’t cause the ranking boost. The visibility did.


I've performed hundreds of structured data tests in the last couple of years alone, and haven't seen anything that shows Schema directly affects rankings... At least not anymore.


🔥 AI Schema (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini): Flexible, Semantic, Context-Heavy

AI models take a completely different approach.

LLMs use schema to understand:

  • Your expertise
  • Your service area
  • Your relationships between concepts
  • The entities you’re connected to
  • The domain you operate in


They happily consume fields Google now ignores, such as:

  • about
  • isRelatedTo
  • knowsAbout
  • Detailed Person/Organization data
  • Custom PropertyValue blocks
  • Wikipedia/Wikidata links
  • Topic clusters
  • Service-level metadata
  • Credentials and experience


LLMs don’t care whether a schema type has a “rich result.”

They care about knowledge, relationships, and clarity.

This makes AI schema incredibly powerful — and massively underappreciated.


🔥 Why This Matters Now

AI-powered search (ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Gemini, Bing Copilot) pulls answers from:

  • Your site content
  • Your structured data
  • Your brand entities
  • External knowledge graphs


Your schema is often the first place these models look for understanding.


So, if your page only includes “Google-safe” schema?


Well, you're missing opportunities.


🔥 The New Best Practice: Hybrid Schema

The winning strategy today is:


1️⃣ Google Schema (strict + supported)

For example:

  • LocalBusiness
  • Service
  • Offer
  • Article
  • FAQPage
  • BreadcrumbList


2️⃣ AI Schema (rich + descriptive)

Added safely inside the same JSON-LD block:

  • about: Topic definitions
  • isRelatedTo: Domain relationships
  • sameAs: Wikidata/Wikipedia grounding
  • Person credentials
  • Entity connections
  • Industry terms
  • Custom metadata


This approach keeps Google happy

and feeds AI the deeper context it loves.


🔥 The Takeaway

If you’re only optimizing schema for Google…

❌ AI search won’t understand what you do

❌ Your brand won’t qualify for LLM responses

❌ You’ll lose visibility in the new wave of search engines


If you use hybrid schema…


✅ Google shows your rich results

✅ AI understands your expertise

✅ You appear in AI-driven answers

✅ You future-proof your visibility

✅ You build brand authority across all search systems


Hybrid schema is the closest thing to a “competitiveness multiplier” we’ve had in years.


Want me to create a hybrid Google+AI schema template for your business or your clients?

I can generate:

  • Local service hybrid schema
  • E-commerce hybrid schema
  • Author/E-E-A-T schema
  • Topic-specific schema clusters
  • Or a full site-wide structured data upgrade strategy



Just hit reply and tell me what industry you’re in.


Comments