This might be a good one to share.

Don’t you love how there always seems to be a new “key phrase” every season? Especially in the business world. Quiet quitting. Snail girl jobs. And now… drumroll please… strategic detachment.

The funny thing is, some of us have been talking about this one for a while now. We just didn’t have a fancy name for it.

So what is it? It’s when we do our jobs, but don’t let them seep into the rest of our lives. We work, and then we go live our lives. Sounds pretty healthy, right? But that phrase makes it sound almost sinister. And honestly, I’m sure corporate culture is terrified by it.

That’s because corporate culture has thrived on people tying their entire identity to their jobs. When what you do becomes who you are, you’re far more likely to go above and beyond what you’re actually being paid for. Longer hours. More emotional investment. Fewer boundaries. That’s been a huge benefit to corporations for a very long time.

So what changed?

We’ve watched company after company lay off employees with absolutely no remorse. We’ve watched businesses adopt AI before it’s truly ready, often with the quiet hope that it can replace people. And more and more workers are waking up to the same realization: there is no real corporate loyalty to employees.

And if that’s the case, why would we trade our identity and our free time for them? It’s kind of a no-brainer.

Believe me when I say that somewhere right now, someone in a boardroom is bringing up this “new” development and trying to figure out how to reel people back in. Not just because it impacts the bottom line, but because placing real importance on life outside of work changes everything.

So what might shift if strategic detachment really takes hold the way it looks like it’s going to?

For starters, fair compensation. Especially when people are asked to do work that falls outside the scope of their role. When your identity isn’t wrapped up in your job, it’s easier to step back and take an honest look at whether you’re actually being paid fairly for what you do.

Right behind that comes an unwillingness to sacrifice life experiences for work. Family time. Being present for your kids. Vacations. Travel. Anything that creates real memories and fulfillment. When your entire sense of self isn’t tied to your job, you understand how important that time really is. And that naturally leads to demands for flexibility, PTO without guilt, and work-from-home arrangements that make balance possible.

Yes, there’s been a big push back to the office over the last year or so. In my opinion, it feels like the last gasp of corporate culture trying to keep us from fully stepping into this kind of detachment.

Then there’s job loyalty.

We’ve already touched on the fact that corporate culture hasn’t shown much loyalty to employees. Recognizing that frees people from feeling like they owe loyalty in return. Leaving for better pay, better hours, or better benefits stops feeling like a personal failure. The loyalty card has been one-sided for a long time, and more people are finally seeing that clearly. And with that comes less guilt and more willingness to choose what’s actually best for their lives.

You can probably see why this could be a huge game changer.

Because keeping good employees would require real change. Not cosmetic changes. Actual shifts. Things like CEOs getting less so valuable employees can be paid more. Systems that allow real flexibility. And yes, loyalty flowing both ways. Something that’s been missing in most workplaces for a very long time.

It would also require a shift in how employees are viewed. Less as a means to profit, more as actual human beings.

What does that look like?

It looks like knowing your people. Nancy in reception is caring for her elderly mother? Maybe working from home would make things a little easier. And maybe there’s enough flexibility built in so she can take her mother to doctor’s appointments without guilt or fear.

Britt in marketing is taking night classes at the local college that will make her more valuable to the company? Pay the tuition. Let her come in a bit later the mornings after class.

Ginny, the administrative assistant, is struggling to make ends meet and her car needs repairs she can’t afford? Review her pay. See if an increase is possible. Maybe even help with that repair.

Basically, it’s being willing to make adjustments and investments based on individual needs.

I know exactly what some people will say. “That’s not an employer’s job.”

But once upon a time, employers did know their employees. They understood individual circumstances and helped where they could. That only stopped when profits became more important than people.

So really, what we’re seeing now isn’t radical. It’s a course correction after decades of unchecked greed.

According to the experts who track this kind of thing, we’re going to see an increase in strategic detachment in 2026. Personally, I think that’s a good thing.

And this isn’t just about corporate jobs. Even those of us who own our own businesses can practice it. It just looks a little different. No more answering emails on weekends and holidays. Taking real vacations. Saying no to clients who bring nothing but stress.

Detachment doesn’t mean you don’t care.

It means you care enough to stop letting work take everything else with it.

Until next time, protect what matters more than your inbox. 📥

Decoding the Shift: Strategic Detachment vs Corporate Culture

Here’s where I think the wires are getting crossed.

Corporate culture hears “strategic detachment” and assumes people are pulling away from their jobs. Like they’re less committed, less motivated, or quietly checking out.

That’s not what’s happening.

What’s actually happening is that work is being moved out of the center of everything. Not abandoned. Just… repositioned.

Corporate culture is built on the idea that work should come first. First in your time and priorities. Often first in your identity, whether anyone says that part out loud or not.

Strategic detachment doesn’t fight that head-on. It just quietly says, “No, actually. This goes here instead.”

The work still gets done. Deadlines still exist. Meetings still happen. People still care. They just stop letting work decide how much of their life it gets to take up.

That’s the part that feels uncomfortable.

Not because productivity disappears, but because the emotional pull changes. A late-night email becomes a decision instead of an obligation. Urgency gets questioned. Guilt loses some of its power.

Corporate culture is used to work being personal.

Strategic detachment makes it… work.

And that small shift explains a lot of the tension that I believe we are going to see if the so-called experts are right and strategic detachment takes center stage this year.

If this resonated, feel free to pass it along to someone who could use it.

You’ll notice a few tools listed below that I actually use. Some include affiliate links, which help support this newsletter at no extra cost to you. Nothing here is random or untested.