My revisionist history of the African and the African diaspora seems to be the most triggering of all things I've ever utter.

The evidence can be seen in the repudiation of comments that exist on Reddit, following my interview on the Joe Rogan Experience.

What's most amusing is that this is the ONLY thing right-leaning people vehemently disagree with me on. Their comments are filled with vitriol.

Why?

The answer is simple. Public education.

This same right-leaning cohort understands that what is taught in public education cannot be trusted. But when it comes to my revision of African history, all of a sudden they seem so trusting of the McGraw-Hill programming.

I find it amusing because I hardly ever quote sources from black people, which I can.

I cite primary sources, like Christopher Columbus' letter to Luis De Sant Angel.

People question whether the natives across the globe were seafaring people but right in this letter Columbus talks of "something like rowing boats, of all sizes, and most of them are larger than an eighteen-oared galley."

I don't like using the term 'revisionist history' because I'm not revising anything. I'm simply citing primary sources that many have not studied.

It is the duty of the people to revise their psyche.

Anyway, if you want to see more evidence of how I trigger people with my knowledge of history, read the comments on this recent interview.

And if you're going to be triggered and rebut my claims, please do not respond to this email.

Instead, write a blog and publish your findings.

Anyway, enjoy the interview with Unsafe Space.

https://youtu.be/h1WE4LxWj9M

Hotep.